On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:08:42 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday 25 July 2011 11:28:44 Ryan Mallon wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_intel_display.c
> > b/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_intel_display.c index 4f47d09..09e378d
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_intel_display.c
> > @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static bool psb_intel_find_best_PLL(struct
> > drm_crtc *crtc, int target, void psb_intel_wait_for_vblank(struct
> > drm_device *dev) {
> > /* Wait for 20ms, i.e. one cycle at 50hz. */
> > - udelay(20000);
> > + mdelay(20);
> > }
> >
> > int psb_intel_pipe_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>
> A 20 ms busy wait is rather nasty. Can't this be replaced with a
> sleeping wait (msleep)?
Don't know yet - its on the fixme list to dig into - I think the answer
is some cases but not all.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
