On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 21:34, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 13:01, jonathan.cameron@xxxxxxxxx
> <jic23@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>On m68k (which doesn't support generic hardirqs yet):
>
> [...]
>
>>>Hence IIO_TRIGGER should depend on GENERIC_HARDIRQS.
>>>But as IIO_TRIGGER and IIO_RING_BUFFER form a maze of dependencies and
>>>selects,
>>>just make the whole IIO subsystem depend on GENERIC_HARDIRQS.
>>>
>>>This dependency also covers !S390, so that one can be removed again.
>> Dratt We talked about this and thought S390 was the only non generic hard irq left. Should have played safe sorry!
>
> I hope s390 will be the only one soon ;-)
>
>>>Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks!
Ping? Still broken in -next (and linus, FWIM).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
