On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:25:09PM -0700, Greg Dietsche wrote: > This code looks wrong to me. I think it meant to return false > if the board's vendor id isn't Broadcom's. > > Compile tested only. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Dietsche <Gregory.Dietsche@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_bmac.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_bmac.c b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_bmac.c > index 4534926..ee13238 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_bmac.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_bmac.c > @@ -1943,7 +1943,7 @@ static bool wlc_validboardtype(struct wlc_hw_info *wlc_hw) > } > > if (wlc_hw->sih->boardvendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM) > - return goodboard; > + goodboard = false; > > return goodboard; > } Actually, the original code is correct. For boards with the Broadcom ID, this function checks that the boardrev is sane. Dev boards that aren't properly configured may have invalid info, so this check is mainly to catch that problem. For boards with any other vendor, we don't have any sanity checks that we know should be done, so the board info is always considered good. The device ID is of course always checked. - Henry _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
