On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 23:30 +0200, NÃmeth MÃrton wrote: > From: MÃrton NÃmeth <nm127@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Change the dump function to > really show the differences in the status bit changes > +static void dump_port_status_diff(u32 prev_status, u32 new_status) > { > int i = 0; > - pr_debug("status %08x:", status); > + pr_debug("status %08x -> %08x:", prev_status, new_status); > for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) { > - if (status & (1 << i)) > - pr_debug(" %s", bit_desc[i]); > + if (!(prev_status & (1 << i)) && > + new_status & (1 << i)) { > + pr_debug(" +%s", bit_desc[i]); > + } else if (prev_status & (1 << i) && > + !(new_status & (1 << i))) { > + pr_debug(" -%s", bit_desc[i]); > + } else if (prev_status & (1 << i) && > + new_status & (1 << i)) { > + pr_debug(" %s", bit_desc[i]); > + } > } > pr_debug("\n"); trivia: I think the output isn't quite what you might expect. It could be interleaved by pr_cont from a different thread. I think this might be a bit more readable as below and this doesn't use implicit newlines by successive pr_<level>. static void dump_port_status_diff(u32 old_status, u32 new_status) { int i = 0; u32 bit = 1; char change; pr_debug("status old->new %08x -> %08x\n", old_status, new_status); while (bit) { u32 old = old_status & bit; u32 new = new_status & bit; char change; if (!old && new) change = '+'; else if (old && !new) change = '-'; else change = ' '; if (old || new) pr_debug(" %c%s\n", change, bit_desc[i]); bit <<= 1; i++; } } I don't know if this is in any sort of fast-path or if gcc will completely optimize this completely away if pr_debug isn't declared, but maybe surround the function implementation with static void dump_port_status_diff(u32 prev_status, u32 new_status) { #ifdef DEBUG ... #endif } _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel