Re: [PATCH 44/83] staging: brcm80211: replaced typedef si_t with struct si_pub

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Julian,

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 02:37, Roland Vossen<rvossen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
Hello Julian,

the structure definition itself is already in a header file (aiutils.h).
Probably you are referring to the forward declaration used in the patch?

Exactly, it probably shouldn't be here as the header file that
includes the structure should arguably already be included.

I am afraid I have to disagree with you, for the reason that by including the header file you introduce unnecessary coupling. Let me elaborate. If a .c file does not need to know the contents of a struct, but it only needs to know that a pointer to an opaque struct, then one should not provide the C file with knowledge on the internals of the struct (hence not include the .h file).

Bye, Roland.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux