On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:26:49AM +0200, Javier Muñoz wrote: > On 05/06/2011 11:22 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Javier M. Mellid wrote: > >>This patch implements dynamic framebuffer mode setting. > >> > >>Previous code works with mode setting in a hard code way. Previous hard > >>code configuration is used as default configuration if dynamic mode > >>setting or boot mode setting (via sm712vga_setup) is not used. > >> > >>Tested with SM712 supporting 1024x600x16 as default hardware resolution. > >> > >>Changes: > >> > >>- Implement fb_check_var and fb_set_par callbacks > >>- Remove __maybe_unused decorator in function being used (sm712vga_setup) > >>- Minor cleanup on initialization structs related with mode settings > >>- Updated author copyright > >>- Updated TODO file > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Javier M. Mellid<jmunhoz@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>--- > >> drivers/staging/sm7xx/TODO | 1 - > > > >This applies with fuzz, this leads me to believe that you didn't test > >this on the latest linux-next tree, right? > > > >What did you make this patch against? > > Sorry, I didn't know. I made this patch against > linux-2.6 (bfd412db9e7b0d8f7b9c09d12d07aa2ac785f1d0) as I did with > previous patches. > > Testing was about creating, applying, compiling and running patch > with kernel built from linux-2.6 > > Do you need a new patch against linux-next's master? I can redo this patch. Yes, please always make patches against linux-next as it includes any other pending patches that are in my tree. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
