On Tuesday 03 May 2011, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote: > > > > The code removal in this series looks good, but the move from > > one proprietary iommu API to another proprietary iommu API > > seems pointless. > > > > It would be much more helpful if you could convert the tidspbridge > > code to the dma-mapping API, or to the generic iommu API > > and provide these interfaces from the omap code. > > Yes, I thought removing a bunch of lines from staging might be good. > I'll check what can be done to use generic iommu or dma-mapping. Ok, excellent. Have you seen the recent discussions on the linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing lists? We've been thinking about how it should be done there, and will continue the discussions in the upcoming Linaro@UDS meeting in Budapest next week. Arnd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
