On Friday 18 February 2022 12:00:54 CET Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:57:47AM +0100, Jérôme Pouiller wrote: > > On Friday 18 February 2022 11:53:58 CET Jerome Pouiller wrote: > > > From: Riccardo Ferrazzo <rferrazzo@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Some variants of the WF200 disallow active scan on channel 12 and 13. > > > For these parts, the channels 12 and 13 are marked IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR. > > > > > > However, the beacon hint procedure was removing the flag > > > IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR from channels where a BSS is discovered. This was > > > making subsequent scans to fail because the driver was trying active > > > scans on prohibited channels. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I forgot to mention I have reviewed on this patch: > > > > Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviwed-by is implied with signed-off-by. > > But what happened to the signed-off-by from the author of this change? The author hasn't used format-patch to transmit this patch. Riccardo, can you reply to this mail with the mention "Signed-off-by: Your name <your-mail@xxxxxxx>"? It certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have the right to pass it on as an open-source patch[1]. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin Thank you, -- Jérôme Pouiller _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
