Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > There is also the patch 01/24 about the SDIO IDs. >> > >> > I think the v10 could contain only 3 patches: >> > >> > 1. mmc: sdio: add SDIO IDs for Silabs WF200 chip >> > 2. dt-bindings: introduce silabs,wfx.yaml >> > 3. [all the patches 3 to 24 squashed] >> > >> > Would it be right for you? >> >> TBH I don't see the point of patch 3 at this moment, we have had so many >> iterations with the full driver already. If people want to look at the >> driver, they can check it from the staging tree. So in the next round I >> recommend submitting only patches 1 and 2 and focus on getting all the >> pending patches to staging tree. > > Ok. > >> And the chances are that a big patch like that would be filtered by the >> mailing lists anyway. > > I believe that with -M, the patch would be very small. Ah, you mean patch 3 would be about moving wfx from drivers/staging to drivers/net/wireless? Yeah, with -M that would be a good idea. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
