Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thursday 10 February 2022 15:20:56 CET Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > Kalle, is this function what you expected? If it is right for you, I am
>> > going to send it to the staging tree.
>>
>> Looks better, but I don't get why '{' and '}' are still needed. Ah, does
>> the firmware require to have them?
>
> Indeed. If '{' and '}' are not present, I guarantee the firmware will return
> an error (or assert). However, I am more confident in the driver than in the
> firmware to report errors to the user.
Agreed.
> If there is no other comment, I am going to:
> - submit this change to the staging tree
Good, it's important that you get all your changes to the staging tree
before the next merge window.
> - publish the tool that generate this new format
> - submit the PDS files referenced in bus_{sdio,spi}.c to linux-firmware
> - send the v10 of this PR
I'm not sure if there's a need to send a full patchset anymore? We are
so close now anyway and the full driver is available from the staging
tree, at least that's what I will use from now on when reviewing wfx.
What about the Device Tree bindings? That needs to be acked by the DT
maintainers, so that's good to submit as a separate patch for review.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
