Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Apache-2.0 is not allowed in the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h | 2 +- > drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_general.h | 2 +- > drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_mib.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h > index b0aa13b23a51..b1829d01a5d9 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 */ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only or Apache-2.0 */ Is the Apache-2.0 license really mandatory? LICENSES/dual/Apache-2.0 is not really supportive. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
