On Wednesday 12 January 2022 11:58:59 CET Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 January 2022 18:14:08 Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> > +static const struct sdio_device_id wfx_sdio_ids[] = {
> > + { SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200) },
> > + { },
> > +};
>
> Hello! Is this table still required?
As far as I understand, if the driver does not provide an id_table, the
probe function won't be never called (see sdio_match_device()).
Since, we rely on the device tree, we could replace SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS
and SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200 by SDIO_ANY_ID. However, it does not hurt
to add an extra filter here.
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, wfx_sdio_ids);
> > +
> > +struct sdio_driver wfx_sdio_driver = {
> > + .name = "wfx-sdio",
> > + .id_table = wfx_sdio_ids,
> > + .probe = wfx_sdio_probe,
> > + .remove = wfx_sdio_remove,
> > + .drv = {
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .of_match_table = wfx_sdio_of_match,
> > + }
> > +};
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
--
Jérôme Pouiller
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
