Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/2] binder: Use receive_fd() to receive file from another process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 6:42 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 06:12:51PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 5:54 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 05:09:32PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> > > > Use receive_fd() to receive file from another process instead of
> > > > combination of get_unused_fd_flags() and fd_install(). This simplifies
> > > > the logic and also makes sure we don't miss any security stuff.
> > >
> > > But no logic is simplified here, and nothing is "missed", so I do not
> > > understand this change at all.
> > >
> >
> > I noticed that we have security_binder_transfer_file() when we
> > transfer some fds. I'm not sure whether we need something like
> > security_file_receive() here?
>
> Why would you?  And where is "here"?
>
> still confused,
>

I mean do we need to go through the file_receive seccomp notifier when
we receive fd (use get_unused_fd_flags() + fd_install now) from
another process in binder_apply_fd_fixups().

Thanks,
Yongji
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux