On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:40:41AM +0530, karthik alapati wrote: > fix some checkpatch "Block comments use * on subsequent lines" > warnings and remove obsolete code > This isn't the correct commit message. It should say something like: "There is a bunch of messy, commented out code. Just delete it." > Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: karthik alapati <mail@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c | 44 ++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c > index 1fd504181..3d22bd304 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c > @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ u32 PHY_QueryBBReg_8723B(struct adapter *Adapter, u32 RegAddr, u32 BitMask) > return 0; > #endif > > - /* RT_TRACE(COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE, ("--->PHY_QueryBBReg(): RegAddr(%#lx), BitMask(%#lx)\n", RegAddr, BitMask)); */ > - > OriginalValue = rtw_read32(Adapter, RegAddr); > BitShift = phy_CalculateBitShift(BitMask); > > @@ -94,8 +92,6 @@ void PHY_SetBBReg_8723B( > return; > #endif > > - /* RT_TRACE(COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE, ("--->PHY_SetBBReg(): RegAddr(%#lx), BitMask(%#lx), Data(%#lx)\n", RegAddr, BitMask, Data)); */ > - > if (BitMask != bMaskDWord) { /* if not "double word" write */ > OriginalValue = rtw_read32(Adapter, RegAddr); > BitShift = phy_CalculateBitShift(BitMask); > @@ -159,13 +155,9 @@ static u32 phy_RFSerialRead_8723B( > if (RfPiEnable) { > /* Read from BBreg8b8, 12 bits for 8190, 20bits for T65 RF */ > retValue = PHY_QueryBBReg(Adapter, pPhyReg->rfLSSIReadBackPi|MaskforPhySet, bLSSIReadBackData); > - > - /* RT_DISP(FINIT, INIT_RF, ("Readback from RF-PI : 0x%x\n", retValue)); */ > } else { > /* Read from BBreg8a0, 12 bits for 8190, 20 bits for T65 RF */ > retValue = PHY_QueryBBReg(Adapter, pPhyReg->rfLSSIReadBack|MaskforPhySet, bLSSIReadBackData); > - > - /* RT_DISP(FINIT, INIT_RF, ("Readback from RF-SI : 0x%x\n", retValue)); */ > } > return retValue; > > @@ -230,15 +222,13 @@ static void phy_RFSerialWrite_8723B( > /* */ > /* Put write addr in [5:0] and write data in [31:16] */ > /* */ > - /* DataAndAddr = (Data<<16) | (NewOffset&0x3f); */ > - DataAndAddr = ((NewOffset<<20) | (Data&0x000fffff)) & 0x0fffffff; /* T65 RF */ > + DataAndAddr = ((NewOffset<<20) | (Data&0x000fffff)) & 0x0fffffff; > + /* T65 RF */ The patch is supposed to be deleting code so we don't want any + lines which change code. Only deletes. Also don't put the coment after the the code which it's commenting on. > @@ -761,20 +745,20 @@ static void phy_PostSetBwMode8723B(struct adapter *Adapter) > > PHY_SetBBReg(Adapter, rFPGA1_RFMOD, bRFMOD, 0x1); > > - /* Set Control channel to upper or lower. These settings are required only for 40MHz */ > + /** > + * Set Control channel to upper or lower. These settings are required only > + * for 40MHz > + */ Yeah. Get rid of these plus lines and resend. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel