> > So I'm in the process of stripping out _dbgdump entirely as per Greg > > K-H's suggestion - am I to understand raw printk is frowned upon though, > > even with the correct KERN_x level specified? > > Yes. Ideally in drivers everything would use dev_dbg() and dev_err() or > whatever. But it's perhaps tricky to convert everything in a single > patch so changing _dbgdump() to "#define pr_debug" as an intermediate > step is probably fine. > > Look at how people do pr_fmt(): > #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt > > You could do a patch that does a mass replacement of DBG_871X with > pr_debug(). Again, I haven't really looked at this code so you'll have > to double check and consider what is the best way to break up the > patches. > That sounds great, I'll take a look, thanks. > > One query I have is that individual patches I'm working on for this file are > > generating an awful lot of checkpatch warnings themselves due to the > > nature of the existing violations on the relevant lines. Is it > > considered acceptable for me to still submit these, providing I do so in > > a series which cleans up the other violations in separate patches? > > It's tricky to know how to break up patches. Probably the simplest > advice is to only clean up a single type of checkpatch warning at a > time. But fix all the instances of that warning in a file. Don't > change anything else even if it is tempting. Do that in the next patch. > > The actuall rules are slightly more complicated and nuanced than that, > but if you just fix one type at a time then that's okay. > > One thing is that your patches should not introduce new checkpatch > warnings. So if you have two statements in an if statement and you > delete one, then that means you have to delete he curly braces as well. > > regards, > dan carpenter > Thanks again for the feedback. I will work on something over the next few days. Regards, Phil _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel