On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 05:00:03PM +0000, Phillip Potter wrote:
> Remove do/while loops from DBG_871X, MSG_8192C and DBG_8192C. Also
> fix opening brace placements and trailing single statement layout within
> RT_PRINT_DATA, as well as making newline character placement more
> consistent and removing camel case where possible. Finally, add
> parentheses for DBG_COUNTER definition.
>
> This fixes 3 checkpatch warnings, 5 checkpatch errors and 3 checkpatch
> checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h | 40 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h
> index c90adfb87261..d06ac9540cf7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h
> @@ -201,19 +201,16 @@
> #ifdef DEBUG
> #if defined(_dbgdump)
> #undef DBG_871X
> - #define DBG_871X(...) do {\
> - _dbgdump(DRIVER_PREFIX __VA_ARGS__);\
> - } while (0)
> + #define DBG_871X(...)\
> + _dbgdump(DRIVER_PREFIX __VA_ARGS__)
>
> #undef MSG_8192C
> - #define MSG_8192C(...) do {\
> - _dbgdump(DRIVER_PREFIX __VA_ARGS__);\
> - } while (0)
> + #define MSG_8192C(...)\
> + _dbgdump(DRIVER_PREFIX __VA_ARGS__)
>
> #undef DBG_8192C
> - #define DBG_8192C(...) do {\
> - _dbgdump(DRIVER_PREFIX __VA_ARGS__);\
> - } while (0)
> + #define DBG_8192C(...)\
> + _dbgdump(DRIVER_PREFIX __VA_ARGS__)
Odd, the do/while is correct here, why is checkpatch complaining about
it?
> #endif /* defined(_dbgdump) */
> #endif /* DEBUG */
>
> @@ -235,25 +232,26 @@
>
> #if defined(_dbgdump)
> #undef RT_PRINT_DATA
> - #define RT_PRINT_DATA(_Comp, _Level, _TitleString, _HexData, _HexDataLen) \
> - if (((_Comp) & GlobalDebugComponents) && (_Level <= GlobalDebugLevel)) \
> - { \
> + #define RT_PRINT_DATA(_comp, _level, _title_string, _hex_data, _hex_data_len) \
> + do { \
> + if (((_comp) & GlobalDebugComponents) && ((_level) <= GlobalDebugLevel)) { \
> int __i; \
This is not the same as the above stuff, when you find yourself writing
"also" in a changelog text, that's a huge hint you should break the
patch up into a patch series.
Please do that here, this is too much for one patch.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
