On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Kari, > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:53 AM Kari Argillander > <kari.argillander@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:42:58AM +0800, carlis wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:32:22 +0200 > > > Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > @@ -82,6 +111,33 @@ enum st7789v_command { > > > > > */ > > > > > static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par) > > > > > { > > > > > + int rc; > > > > > + struct device *dev = par->info->device; > > > > > + > > > > > + par->gpio.te = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "te", 0, > > > > > GPIOD_IN); > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(par->gpio.te)) { > > > > > + rc = PTR_ERR(par->gpio.te); > > > > > + dev_err(par->info->device, "Failed to request te > > > > > gpio: %d\n", rc); > > > > > + return rc; > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > You request with optinal and you still want to error out? We could > > > > just continue and not care about that error. User will be happier if > > > > device still works somehow. > > devm_gpiod_get_index_optional() returns NULL, not an error, if the > GPIO is not found. So if IS_ERR() is the right check. > > And checks for -EPROBE_DEFER can be handled automatically > by using dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err(). Yeah. Thanks for pointing that clearly. > > > You mean i just delete this dev_err print ?! > > > like this: > > > par->gpio.te = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "te", > > > 0,GPIOD_IN); > > > if (IS_ERR(par->gpio.te)) > > > return PTR_ERR(par->gpio.te); > > > > Not exactly. I'm suggesting something like this. > > > > if (IS_ERR(par->gpio.te) == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > > > if (IS_ERR(par->gpio.te)) > > par-gpio.te = NULL; > > > > This like beginning of your patch series but the difference is that if > > EPROBE_DEFER then we will try again later. Any other error and we will > > just ignore TE gpio. But this is up to you what you want to do. To me > > this just seems place where this kind of logic can work. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel