On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 20:51:41 +0300
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:40:35PM +0800, Carlis wrote:
> > @@ -82,6 +111,29 @@ enum st7789v_command {
> > */
> > static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
> > {
> > + int rc;
> > + struct device *dev = par->info->device;
> > +
> > + par->gpio.te = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "te", 0,
> > GPIOD_IN);
> > + if (par->gpio.te) {
>
> I explained in my earlier review that devm_gpiod_get_index_optional()
> can return error pointers... There was quite a bit of detail about
> how to handle this correctly in my earlier review, but I think you
> might not have noticed it. Please read it again.
>
> > + init_completion(&spi_panel_te);
> > + mutex_init(&te_mutex);
> > + rc = devm_request_irq(dev,
> > + gpiod_to_irq(par->gpio.te),
> > + spi_panel_te_handler,
> > IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
> > + "TE_GPIO", par);
> > + if (rc) {
> > + pr_err("TE request_irq failed.\n");
> > + devm_gpiod_put(dev, par->gpio.te);
> > + par->gpio.te = NULL;
> > + } else {
> > +
> > disable_irq_nosync(gpiod_to_irq(par->gpio.te));
> > + pr_info("TE request_irq completion.\n");
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + pr_err("%s:%d, TE gpio not specified\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__);
> > + }
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Thank you for your correction,i will change pr_err to pr_info in next
patch v5
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
