> 2011/4/12 George Kashperko <george@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> 2011/4/12 RafaÅ MiÅecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> That way I see really low (or not at all) relation between out > >> (not)Broadcom bus and present AMBA bus. > >> > > Agree. > > Ehh, sounds like one more renaming to functions, defines, prefixes. > > Let's wait for Arend comments, he was the one voting for not-bcm-specific name. > Sounds like good plan :) Btw, while waiting.... Digging the web clearing different things around ssb/axi found few broadcom ssb docs some of you maybe find interesting to look through. http://read.pudn.com/downloads127/doc/fileformat/537112/mips/bcm5836/5836-5836P-PG01-RDS.pdf http://www.broadcom.com/collateral/pg/440X-PG02-R.pdf Also, one more question to Arend: could you please ask if there are any plans on lifting UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY for GMAC core driver sources (etcgmac.c, have this core at bcm4716-based ASUS N16, might used at other bcm471X socs as well) or possibly Broadcom could publish some doc for the chip? Have nice day, George _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
