On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 21:22 +0100, Ayoub Soussi wrote:
> Fixed coding style issue.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ralink-gdma/ralink-gdma.c b/drivers/staging/ralink-gdma/ralink-gdma.c
[]
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct gdma_dma_dev {
> struct gdma_data *data;
> void __iomem *base;
> struct tasklet_struct task;
> +
> volatile unsigned long chan_issued;
> atomic_t cnt;
This is presumably a checkpatch false positive.
checkpatch is not now nor never will be a perfect tool.
Please consider what you are doing and what the desired coding style is
before submitting patches.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
