Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> +void wfx_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_tx_control *control,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct wfx_dev *wdev = hw->priv;
> + struct wfx_vif *wvif;
> + struct ieee80211_sta *sta = control ? control->sta : NULL;
> + struct ieee80211_tx_info *tx_info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
> + struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data;
> + size_t driver_data_room = sizeof_field(struct ieee80211_tx_info,
> + rate_driver_data);
> +
> + compiletime_assert(sizeof(struct wfx_tx_priv) <= driver_data_room,
> + "struct tx_priv is too large");
Interesting, never seen compiletime_assert() before. But I suspect
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG() is preferred, at least there are more users.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
