On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:40:06PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Sergio Paracuellos > <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:05 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > After this I think the driver looks good and can graduate from staging. > > > Can you send a patch to move this to drivers/pinctrl next > > > > > > I think drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rt2880.c since we don't expect a lot > > > more of them. > > > > Perfect, let me write the bindings yaml file and send the patch moving this. > > > > What git tree do you prefer the patch to be rebased onto? > > I suppose Gregs since he has some changes to it that it need to > be based on. After v5.11-rc1 it could be the pinctrl tree as well. > I don't know if Greg has a favourite way to de-stage drivers? It all depends on what the subsystem maintainer wants to do. Sometimes we just do a "add a new driver to the real spot" that goes through the subsystem tree, and when that is accepted, I delete the driver in the staging tree. This is most often in networking. Or you can wait until -rc1 and do a move in your tree, or just tell me to do the move in my tree with an ack, and I can handle it all. Whatever is easier for you is fine with me, I'm flexible :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
