Re: [RFC][WAS:bcmai][PATCH V2] axi: add AXI bus driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:45:00PM +0200, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote:
> Cc: Michael BÃsch <mb@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: George Kashperko <george@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linuxdriverproject <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: RafaÅ MiÅecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This is second try for introducing new bus driver.
> V2: Rename to axi
>     Use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE in bridge
>     Make use of pr_fmt and pr_*
>     Store core class
>     Rename bridge to not b43 specific
>     Replace magic 0x1000 with BCMAI_CORE_SIZE
>     Remove some old "ssb" names and defines
>     Move BCMAI_ADDR_BASE def
>     Add drvdata field
> TODO:
> - Interrupts
> - Reloading driver

Please add to the TODO list:
	- Documentation/ABI entries for new sysfs files
	- proper Kconfig entry documentation for the different options
	- remove unneeded pcicore_write* wrapper functions that do
	  nothing.


> +static void axi_release_core_dev(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	kfree(dev);
> +}

This is wrong, unless you are really only creating a 'struct device'.
Why are you doing that instead of embedding struct device in your
structure?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux