Hi Chuanhong, On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 2:26 AM Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] > > I've already said in previous threads that clock assignment in > current linux kernel is not trustworthy. > I've got the clock plan for mt7621 now. (Can't share it, sorry.) > Most of your clock assumptions above are incorrect. Well, that was of course expected, without a real clock plan this driver was only taking into account Oleksij Rempel suggestions to try to make a driver good enough to properly be maintained :). > I've made a clock driver with gate support a few months ago.[0] > but I don't have much time to really finish it. > Maybe you could rework your clock gate driver based on it. > > [0] https://github.com/981213/linux/commit/2eca1f045e4c3db18c941135464c0d7422ad8133 Thanks for the link, I see there are three more clocks there with frequencies of 125, 250 and 270 Mhz. all of them having main xtal as parent. Ok, I will take this real information into account and will send v2 after a bit of more feedback comes. > -- > Regards, > Chuanhong Guo Best regards, Sergio Paracuellos _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
