2011/4/8 RafaÅ MiÅecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2011/4/8 RafaÅ MiÅecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Could you say something more about *class*, please? For my BCM43224 it >> seems to be 0x0. WIll check BCM4313 in a moment. > > Same for BCM4313. > > BCM43224: > axi: Core 0 found: ChipCommon (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x800, rev 0x22, class 0x0) > axi: Core 1 found: IEEE 802.11 (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x812, rev 0x17, class 0x0) > axi: Core 2 found: PCIe (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x820, rev 0x0F, class 0x0) > > BCM4313 > axi: Core 0 found: ChipCommon (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x800, rev 0x24, class 0x0) > axi: Core 1 found: IEEE 802.11 (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x812, rev 0x18, class 0x0) > axi: Core 2 found: PCIe (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x820, rev 0x11, class 0x0) This is last one, really ;) This is MMIO dump (from wl): R 4 92.541328 1 0xfaafc000 0x4bf80001 0x0 0 R 4 92.541351 1 0xfaafc014 0x4bf81201 0x0 0 R 4 92.541373 1 0xfaafc028 0x4bf82001 0x0 0 So there is not any mistake in my reading code. This the youngest 0x1 is SCAN_ER_VALID. -- RafaÅ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
