Re: [PATCH] staging: mt7621-dma: Prefer Using BIT Macro instead of left shifting on 1.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:04:02AM +0530, siddhant gupta(siddhant1223) wrote:
> 
> Replace left shifting on 1 by a BIT macro to fix checkpatch warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Siddhant Gupta <siddhantgupta416@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c b/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c
> index 354536783e1c..a9e1a1b14035 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
>  #define HSDMA_GLO_TX_DMA		BIT(0)
>  
>  #define HSDMA_BT_SIZE_16BYTES		(0 << HSDMA_GLO_BT_SHIFT)
> -#define HSDMA_BT_SIZE_32BYTES		(1 << HSDMA_GLO_BT_SHIFT)
> +#define HSDMA_BT_SIZE_32BYTES		BIT(HSDMA_GLO_BT_SHIFT)
>  #define HSDMA_BT_SIZE_64BYTES		(2 << HSDMA_GLO_BT_SHIFT)
>  #define HSDMA_BT_SIZE_128BYTES		(3 << HSDMA_GLO_BT_SHIFT)

In looking at the code, does this change really make sense?

(hint, I don't think so...)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux