On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 07:45:37PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Bits related to the interface data width do not have any effect when
> the CSI controller is taking input from the MIPI CSI-2 controller.
I guess it would be clearer to mention that the data width is only
applicable for parallel here.
> In prevision of adding support for this case, set these bits
> conditionally so there is no ambiguity.
>
> Co-developed-by: Kévin L'hôpital <kevin.lhopital@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kévin L'hôpital <kevin.lhopital@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c | 42 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> index 5d2389a5cd17..a876a05ea3c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> @@ -378,8 +378,13 @@ static void sun6i_csi_setup_bus(struct sun6i_csi_dev *sdev)
> unsigned char bus_width;
> u32 flags;
> u32 cfg;
> + bool input_parallel = false;
> bool input_interlaced = false;
>
> + if (endpoint->bus_type == V4L2_MBUS_PARALLEL ||
> + endpoint->bus_type == V4L2_MBUS_BT656)
> + input_parallel = true;
> +
> if (csi->config.field == V4L2_FIELD_INTERLACED
> || csi->config.field == V4L2_FIELD_INTERLACED_TB
> || csi->config.field == V4L2_FIELD_INTERLACED_BT)
> @@ -395,6 +400,26 @@ static void sun6i_csi_setup_bus(struct sun6i_csi_dev *sdev)
> CSI_IF_CFG_HREF_POL_MASK | CSI_IF_CFG_FIELD_MASK |
> CSI_IF_CFG_SRC_TYPE_MASK);
>
> + if (input_parallel) {
> + switch (bus_width) {
> + case 8:
> + cfg |= CSI_IF_CFG_IF_DATA_WIDTH_8BIT;
> + break;
> + case 10:
> + cfg |= CSI_IF_CFG_IF_DATA_WIDTH_10BIT;
> + break;
> + case 12:
> + cfg |= CSI_IF_CFG_IF_DATA_WIDTH_12BIT;
> + break;
> + case 16: /* No need to configure DATA_WIDTH for 16bit */
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_warn(sdev->dev, "Unsupported bus width: %u\n",
> + bus_width);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (input_interlaced)
> cfg |= CSI_IF_CFG_SRC_TYPE_INTERLACED;
> else
> @@ -440,23 +465,6 @@ static void sun6i_csi_setup_bus(struct sun6i_csi_dev *sdev)
> break;
> }
>
> - switch (bus_width) {
> - case 8:
> - cfg |= CSI_IF_CFG_IF_DATA_WIDTH_8BIT;
> - break;
> - case 10:
> - cfg |= CSI_IF_CFG_IF_DATA_WIDTH_10BIT;
> - break;
> - case 12:
> - cfg |= CSI_IF_CFG_IF_DATA_WIDTH_12BIT;
> - break;
> - case 16: /* No need to configure DATA_WIDTH for 16bit */
> - break;
> - default:
> - dev_warn(sdev->dev, "Unsupported bus width: %u\n", bus_width);
> - break;
> - }
> -
Is there any reason to move it around?
Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
