Hi, thanks,
Am 20.10.20 um 16:46 schrieb Colin King:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Don't populate the const array dev_names on the stack but instead it
static. Makes the object code smaller by 15 bytes.
Before:
text data bss dec hex filename
17091 2648 64 19803 4d5b media/rkisp1/rkisp1-resizer.o
After:
text data bss dec hex filename
17012 2712 64 19788 4d4c media/rkisp1/rkisp1-resizer.o
On the other hand the data segment is 64 bytes bigger.
I don't know what is more important to save.
Anyway, the rkisp1-capture.c does the same with the names
so it is better to be consistent.
Thanks,
Dafna
(gcc version 10.2.0)
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-resizer.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-resizer.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-resizer.c
index 1687d82e6c68..7ca5b47c5bf5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-resizer.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-resizer.c
@@ -763,8 +763,10 @@ static void rkisp1_rsz_unregister(struct rkisp1_resizer *rsz)
static int rkisp1_rsz_register(struct rkisp1_resizer *rsz)
{
- const char * const dev_names[] = {RKISP1_RSZ_MP_DEV_NAME,
- RKISP1_RSZ_SP_DEV_NAME};
+ static const char * const dev_names[] = {
+ RKISP1_RSZ_MP_DEV_NAME,
+ RKISP1_RSZ_SP_DEV_NAME
+ };
struct media_pad *pads = rsz->pads;
struct v4l2_subdev *sd = &rsz->sd;
int ret;
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
