Hi Helen, On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:55:32PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote: > From: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > RK3399 has two ISPs, but only isp0 was tested. > Add isp0 node in rk3399 dtsi > > Verified with: > make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-isp1.yaml > > Signed-off-by: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen <jacob2.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > V4: > - update clock names > > V3: > - clean up clocks > > V2: > - re-order power-domains property > > V1: > This patch was originally part of this patchset: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10267431/ > > The only difference is: > - add phy properties > - add ports > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > index dba9641947a3a..ed8ba75dbbce8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > @@ -1721,6 +1721,31 @@ vopb_mmu: iommu@ff903f00 { > status = "disabled"; > }; > > + isp0: isp0@ff910000 { > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-cif-isp"; > + reg = <0x0 0xff910000 0x0 0x4000>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 43 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; > + clocks = <&cru SCLK_ISP0>, > + <&cru ACLK_ISP0_WRAPPER>, > + <&cru HCLK_ISP0_WRAPPER>; > + clock-names = "isp", "aclk", "hclk"; > + iommus = <&isp0_mmu>; > + phys = <&mipi_dphy_rx0>; > + phy-names = "dphy"; > + power-domains = <&power RK3399_PD_ISP0>; Should this have status = "disabled" too? The mipi_dphy_rx0 node is disabled by default too, so in the default configuration the driver would always fail to probe. Best regards, Tomasz _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
