Hey Sakari - thanks for the reply On 17/09/2020 11:33, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thank you for the patch. > > Is this all that it takes to add support for some machines shipped with > Windows? Almost > The ones I know require PMIC control done in software (not even > sensors are accessible without that). So far we've just been getting the sensor drivers themselves to toggle the gpio pins that turn the PMIC on (those pins are listed against the PMIC's _CRS, and we've been finding those by evaluating the sensor's _DEP) - once that's done the cameras show up on i2c and,with the bridge driver installed, you can use libcamera to take photos. That's been confusing me a bit; I think I mentioned before that I couldn't figure out how the clocks and regulators could be working in that case. But I've had a bunch of people test this now on about 5 different machines (Surface devices and similar) and it seems to "just work" > One possibility would be to put this to platform code. That would > effectively also require it's compiled to the kernel (yuck). > > How about just squashing this to the CIO2 driver instead (but still as a > separate file)? It's not exactly pretty, no, but it could allow this being > a module and not enlarge everyone's kernel, and the initialisation would at > the same time take place before the rest of what the CIO2 driver does in > probe. I thought of that as well, but wasn't sure which was preferable. I can compress it into the CIO2 driver though sure. > I think you should still check whether CIO2 has graph endpoints before > proceeding with parsing SSDB buffer or looking up random-looking devices. Yeah; I was under the impression this wasn't working at all on ACPI platforms - if it actually is on some then I guess checking for endpoints before making an attempt to parse SSDB to build them is the way to go? > > Cc Andy, too. > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:36:18PM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote: >> Currently on ACPI platforms, sensors that are intended to be connected to >> a CIO2 device for use with the ipu3-cio2 driver lack the necessary >> connection information in firmware. This patch adds a module to parse the >> connection properties from the SSDB buffer in DSDT and build the connection >> using software nodes. >> >> The ipu3-cio2 driver itself is modified to insert the cio2-bridge module >> after all sensors that have created a device link between themselves and >> the CIO2 have probed. Sensors wishing to use this bridge will need to add >> a device link between themselves and the CIO2 device as part of their own >> .probe() call. >> >> Suggested-by: Jordan Hand <jorhand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> This module's born out of efforts by the linux-surface github community >> to get functioning webcams on Microsoft Surface and similar platforms. it >> is dependent on this patch (which implements the software node graph family >> of functions): >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20200915232827.3416-1-djrscally@xxxxxxxxx/ >> >> I wanted to raise this as an RFC as although I don't think it's ready for >> integration it has some things that I'd like feedback on, in particular the >> method I chose to make the module be auto-inserted. A more ideal method would >> have been to have the driver be an ACPI driver for the INT343E device, but each > What do you think this device does represent? Devices whose status is > always zero may exist in the table even if they would not be actually > present. > > CIO2 is a PCI device and it has no ACPI (or PNP) ID, or at least should not > have one. This is the ACPI entry I mean: Device (CIO2) { Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) // _STA: Status { If ((CIOE == One)) { Return (0x0F) } Else { Return (Zero) } } Name (_HID, "INT343E") // _HID: Hardware ID Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings { Name (CBUF, ResourceTemplate () { Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, Shared, ,, _Y15) { 0x00000010, } Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite, 0xFE400000, // Address Base 0x00010000, // Address Length ) }) CreateDWordField (CBUF, \_SB.PCI0.CIO2._CRS._Y15._INT, CIOV) // _INT: Interrupts CIOV = CIOI /* \CIOI */ Return (CBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.CIO2._CRS.CBUF */ } } >> of the the devices we've tested this on that dev has status 0 and so the module >> won't bind to it. The device links method seems a little clunky, but does work, >> and I think I have done the conditional processing correctly so that ipu3-cio2 >> continues to work on non-ACPI platforms. > I don't think anyone uses ipu3-cio2 driver on non-ACPI platforms. It really > does require ACPI. Oh - I've been misunderstanding that then. In that case the CONFIG_ACPI checks can go but I need to be checking for existing endpoints from APCI fwnodes I think >> MAINTAINERS | 6 + >> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c | 67 +++- >> drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Kconfig | 15 + >> drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/staging/media/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 448 +++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 5 files changed, 534 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index b5cfab015bd6..55b0b9888bc0 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -9152,6 +9152,12 @@ S: Maintained >> W: http://www.adaptec.com/ >> F: drivers/scsi/ips* >> >> +IPU3 CIO2 Bridge Driver >> +M: Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> >> +L: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> +S: Maintained >> +F: drivers/staging/media/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c >> + >> IPVS >> M: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> M: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c >> index 92f5eadf2c99..fd941d2c7581 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c >> @@ -1719,6 +1719,59 @@ static void cio2_queues_exit(struct cio2_device *cio2) >> cio2_queue_exit(cio2, &cio2->queue[i]); >> } >> >> +static int cio2_probe_can_progress(struct pci_dev *pci_dev) >> +{ >> + void *sensor; >> + >> + /* >> + * On ACPI platforms, we need to probe _after_ sensors wishing to connect >> + * to cio2 have added a device link. If there are no consumers yet, then >> + * we need to defer. The .sync_state() callback will then be called after >> + * all linked sensors have probed >> + */ >> + >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)) { >> + sensor = (struct device *)list_first_entry_or_null( >> + &pci_dev->dev.links.consumers, >> + struct dev_links_info, >> + consumers); > Please wrap so it's under 80. > Will do >> + >> + if (!sensor) >> + return -EPROBE_DEFER; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +void cio2_sync_state(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct cio2_device *cio2; >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)) { >> + cio2 = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + >> + if (!cio2) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to retrieve driver data\n"); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + /* insert the bridge driver to connect sensors via software nodes */ >> + ret = request_module("cio2-bridge"); >> + >> + if (ret) >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to insert cio2-bridge\n"); >> + >> + ret = cio2_parse_firmware(cio2); >> + >> + if (ret) { >> + v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&cio2->notifier); >> + v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&cio2->notifier); >> + cio2_queues_exit(cio2); >> + } >> + } >> +} >> + >> /**************** PCI interface ****************/ >> >> static int cio2_pci_config_setup(struct pci_dev *dev) >> @@ -1746,6 +1799,11 @@ static int cio2_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, >> void __iomem *const *iomap; >> int r; >> >> + r = cio2_probe_can_progress(pci_dev); >> + >> + if (r) >> + return -EPROBE_DEFER; >> + >> cio2 = devm_kzalloc(&pci_dev->dev, sizeof(*cio2), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!cio2) >> return -ENOMEM; >> @@ -1821,9 +1879,11 @@ static int cio2_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, >> v4l2_async_notifier_init(&cio2->notifier); >> >> /* Register notifier for subdevices we care */ >> - r = cio2_parse_firmware(cio2); >> - if (r) >> - goto fail_clean_notifier; >> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)) { >> + r = cio2_parse_firmware(cio2); >> + if (r) >> + goto fail_clean_notifier; >> + } >> >> r = devm_request_irq(&pci_dev->dev, pci_dev->irq, cio2_irq, >> IRQF_SHARED, CIO2_NAME, cio2); >> @@ -2052,6 +2112,7 @@ static struct pci_driver cio2_pci_driver = { >> .remove = cio2_pci_remove, >> .driver = { >> .pm = &cio2_pm_ops, >> + .sync_state = cio2_sync_state >> }, >> }; >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Kconfig >> index 3e9640523e50..08842fd8c0da 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Kconfig >> @@ -14,3 +14,18 @@ config VIDEO_IPU3_IMGU >> >> Say Y or M here if you have a Skylake/Kaby Lake SoC with a MIPI >> camera. The module will be called ipu3-imgu. >> + >> +config VIDEO_CIO2_BRIDGE >> + tristate "IPU3 CIO2 Sensor Bridge Driver" >> + depends on PCI && VIDEO_V4L2 >> + depends on ACPI >> + depends on X86 >> + help >> + This module provides a bridge connecting sensors (I.E. cameras) to >> + the CIO2 device infrastructure via software nodes built from information >> + parsed from the SSDB buffer. >> + >> + Say Y or M here if your platform's cameras use IPU3 with connections >> + that should be defined in ACPI. The module will be called cio2-bridge. >> + >> + If in doubt, say N here. >> \ No newline at end of file >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Makefile b/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Makefile >> index 9def80ef28f3..12dff56dbb9e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Makefile >> @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ ipu3-imgu-objs += \ >> ipu3-css.o ipu3-v4l2.o ipu3.o >> >> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IPU3_IMGU) += ipu3-imgu.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CIO2_BRIDGE) += cio2-bridge.o >> \ No newline at end of file >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..5115aeeb35a1 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,448 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +#include <linux/acpi.h> >> +#include <acpi/acpi_bus.h> >> +#include <linux/device.h> >> +#include <linux/i2c.h> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h> >> +#include <linux/module.h> >> +#include <linux/pci.h> >> +#include <media/v4l2-subdev.h> >> + >> +#include <linux/fwnode.h> >> +#include <linux/kref.h> >> + >> +static void cio2_bridge_exit(void); >> +static int cio2_bridge_init(void); >> + >> +#define MAX_CONNECTED_DEVICES 4 >> +#define SWNODE_SENSOR_HID 0 >> +#define SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT 1 >> +#define SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT 2 >> +#define SWNODE_CIO2_PORT 3 >> +#define SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT 4 >> +#define SWNODE_NULL_TERMINATOR 5 >> + >> +#define CIO2_HID "INT343E" >> +#define CIO2_PCI_ID 0x9d32 >> + >> +#define ENDPOINT_SENSOR 0 >> +#define ENDPOINT_CIO2 1 >> + >> +#define NODE_HID(_HID) \ >> +((const struct software_node) { \ >> + _HID, \ >> +}) >> + >> +#define NODE_PORT(_PORT, _HID_NODE) \ >> +((const struct software_node) { \ >> + _PORT, \ >> + _HID_NODE, \ >> +}) >> + >> +#define NODE_ENDPOINT(_EP, _PORT, _PROPS) \ >> +((const struct software_node) { \ >> + _EP, \ >> + _PORT, \ >> + _PROPS, \ >> +}) >> + >> +#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_NULL \ >> +((const struct property_entry) { }) > Alignment. Same appears to apply to other macros (please indent). Yep > >> +#define SOFTWARE_NODE_NULL \ >> +((const struct software_node) { }) >> + >> +/* >> + * Extend this array with ACPI Hardware ID's of devices known to be >> + * working >> + */ >> + >> +static char *supported_devices[] = { >> + "INT33BE", >> + "OVTI2680", >> + "OVTI5648", >> +}; >> + >> +/* >> + * software_node needs const char * names. Can't snprintf a const char *, >> + * so instead we need an array of them and use the port num from SSDB as >> + * an index. >> + */ >> + >> +const char *port_names[] = { >> + "port0", "port1", "port2", "port3", "port4", >> + "port5", "port6", "port7", "port8", "port9" > I think CIO2 is limited to 4. Yep - forgot to drop that after I checked the max >> +}; >> + >> +struct software_node cio2_hid_node = { CIO2_HID, }; >> + >> +struct sensor { >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct software_node swnodes[5]; >> + struct property_entry sensor_props[6]; >> + struct property_entry cio2_props[3]; >> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; >> +}; >> + >> +struct cio2_bridge { >> + int n_sensors; >> + struct sensor sensors[MAX_CONNECTED_DEVICES]; >> + struct pci_dev *cio2; >> + struct fwnode_handle *cio2_fwnode; >> +}; >> + >> +struct cio2_bridge bridge = { 0, }; >> + >> +static const struct property_entry remote_endpoints[] = { >> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("remote-endpoint", /* Sensor 0, Sensor Property */ >> + &bridge.sensors[0].swnodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT]), >> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("remote-endpoint", /* Sensor 0, CIO2 Property */ >> + &bridge.sensors[0].swnodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT]), >> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("remote-endpoint", >> + &bridge.sensors[1].swnodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT]), >> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("remote-endpoint", >> + &bridge.sensors[1].swnodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT]), >> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("remote-endpoint", >> + &bridge.sensors[2].swnodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT]), >> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("remote-endpoint", >> + &bridge.sensors[2].swnodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT]), >> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("remote-endpoint", >> + &bridge.sensors[3].swnodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT]), >> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("remote-endpoint", >> + &bridge.sensors[3].swnodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT]), >> + { } >> +}; >> + >> +/* Data representation as it is in ACPI SSDB buffer */ >> +struct sensor_bios_data_packed { >> + u8 version; >> + u8 sku; >> + u8 guid_csi2[16]; >> + u8 devfunction; >> + u8 bus; >> + u32 dphylinkenfuses; >> + u32 clockdiv; >> + u8 link; >> + u8 lanes; >> + u32 csiparams[10]; >> + u32 maxlanespeed; >> + u8 sensorcalibfileidx; >> + u8 sensorcalibfileidxInMBZ[3]; >> + u8 romtype; >> + u8 vcmtype; >> + u8 platforminfo; >> + u8 platformsubinfo; >> + u8 flash; >> + u8 privacyled; >> + u8 degree; >> + u8 mipilinkdefined; >> + u32 mclkspeed; >> + u8 controllogicid; >> + u8 reserved1[3]; >> + u8 mclkport; >> + u8 reserved2[13]; >> +} __attribute__((__packed__)); >> + >> +/* Fields needed by bridge driver */ >> +struct sensor_bios_data { >> + struct device *dev; >> + u8 link; >> + u8 lanes; >> + u32 mclkspeed; >> +}; >> + >> +static int read_acpi_block(struct device *dev, char *id, void *data, u32 size) >> +{ >> + union acpi_object *obj; >> + struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL }; >> + struct acpi_handle *dev_handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev); >> + int status; >> + u32 buffer_length; >> + >> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(dev_handle, id, NULL, &buffer); >> + if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + obj = (union acpi_object *)buffer.pointer; >> + if (!obj || obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Could't read acpi buffer\n"); >> + status = -ENODEV; >> + goto err; >> + } >> + >> + if (obj->buffer.length > size) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Given buffer is too small\n"); >> + status = -ENODEV; >> + goto err; >> + } >> + >> + memcpy(data, obj->buffer.pointer, min(size, obj->buffer.length)); >> + buffer_length = obj->buffer.length; >> + kfree(buffer.pointer); >> + >> + return buffer_length; >> +err: >> + kfree(buffer.pointer); >> + return status; >> +} >> + >> +static int get_acpi_ssdb_sensor_data(struct device *dev, >> + struct sensor_bios_data *sensor) >> +{ >> + struct sensor_bios_data_packed sensor_data; >> + int ret = read_acpi_block(dev, "SSDB", &sensor_data, >> + sizeof(sensor_data)); >> + >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to fetch SSDB data\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + sensor->link = sensor_data.link; >> + sensor->lanes = sensor_data.lanes; >> + sensor->mclkspeed = sensor_data.mclkspeed; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int create_endpoint_properties(struct device *dev, >> + struct sensor_bios_data *ssdb, >> + struct property_entry *sensor_props, >> + struct property_entry *cio2_props) >> +{ >> + u32 *data_lanes; > Indentation. Will fix > >> + int i; >> + >> + data_lanes = devm_kmalloc(dev, sizeof(u32) * (int)ssdb->lanes, >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + >> + if (!data_lanes) { >> + dev_err(dev, >> + "Couldn't allocate memory for data lanes array\n"); >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < (int)ssdb->lanes; i++) >> + data_lanes[i] = (u32)i + 1; >> + >> + sensor_props[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("clock-frequency", >> + ssdb->mclkspeed); >> + sensor_props[1] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("bus-type", 5); >> + sensor_props[2] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("clock-lanes", 0); > This isn't needed on sensors in practice. Just clock-lanes you mean? or all 3 of those entries? > >> + sensor_props[3] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32_ARRAY_LEN("data-lanes", >> + data_lanes, >> + (int)ssdb->lanes); >> + sensor_props[4] = remote_endpoints[(bridge.n_sensors * 2) + ENDPOINT_SENSOR]; >> + sensor_props[5] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_NULL; >> + >> + cio2_props[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32_ARRAY_LEN("data-lanes", >> + data_lanes, >> + (int)ssdb->lanes); >> + cio2_props[1] = remote_endpoints[(bridge.n_sensors * 2) + ENDPOINT_CIO2]; >> + cio2_props[2] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_NULL; > I suppose the CSI-2 link frequency is generally encoded in drivers in this > case. A lot of drivers already check for those, could you add the > frequencies here as well (as they are known)? Yes, I also added (after I sent this in...) the camera rotation from SSDB. >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int connect_supported_devices(void) >> +{ >> + struct acpi_device *adev; >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct sensor_bios_data ssdb; >> + struct sensor *sensor; >> + struct property_entry *sensor_props; >> + struct property_entry *cio2_props; >> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; >> + struct software_node *nodes; >> + struct v4l2_subdev *sd; >> + int i, ret; > unsigned int i Thank you >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(supported_devices); i++) { >> + adev = acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev(supported_devices[i], >> + NULL, -1); >> + >> + if (!adev) >> + continue; >> + >> + dev = bus_find_device_by_acpi_dev(&i2c_bus_type, adev); >> + >> + if (!dev) { >> + pr_info("ACPI match for %s, but it has no i2c device\n", >> + supported_devices[i]); >> + continue; >> + } >> + >> + if (!dev->driver_data) { >> + pr_info("ACPI match for %s, but it has no driver\n", >> + supported_devices[i]); >> + continue; >> + } else { >> + pr_info("Found supported device %s\n", >> + supported_devices[i]); >> + } >> + >> + sensor = &bridge.sensors[bridge.n_sensors]; >> + /* >> + * Store sensor's existing fwnode so that it can be restored if >> + * this module is removed. >> + */ >> + sensor->fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(dev->fwnode); >> + >> + get_acpi_ssdb_sensor_data(dev, &ssdb); >> + >> + nodes = sensor->swnodes; >> + sensor_props = sensor->sensor_props; >> + cio2_props = sensor->cio2_props; >> + fwnode = sensor->fwnode; >> + >> + ret = create_endpoint_properties(dev, &ssdb, sensor_props, >> + cio2_props); >> + >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + /* build the software nodes */ >> + >> + nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID] = NODE_HID(supported_devices[i]); >> + nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT] = NODE_PORT("port0", >> + &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID]); >> + nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT] = NODE_ENDPOINT("endpoint0", >> + &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT], >> + sensor_props); >> + nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT] = NODE_PORT(port_names[(int)ssdb.link], >> + &cio2_hid_node); >> + nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT] = NODE_ENDPOINT("endpoint0", >> + &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT], >> + cio2_props); >> + nodes[SWNODE_NULL_TERMINATOR] = SOFTWARE_NODE_NULL; >> + >> + ret = software_node_register_nodes(nodes); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, >> + "Failed to register software nodes for %s\n", >> + supported_devices[i]); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + fwnode = software_node_fwnode(&nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID]); >> + if (!fwnode) { >> + dev_err(dev, >> + "Failed to get software node for %s\n", >> + supported_devices[i]); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + fwnode->secondary = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); >> + dev->fwnode = fwnode; >> + >> + /* >> + * The device should by this point has driver_data set to an >> + * instance of struct v4l2_subdev; set the fwnode for that too. >> + */ >> + >> + sd = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + sd->fwnode = fwnode; > I'm a bit lost here. Isn't it enough to have the sensor device's fwnode, > and to use that for V4L2 async fwnode matching (as usual)? I'll double check that - I think I had decided it wasn't working without both set, but I could very easily be wrong about that >> + >> + sensor->dev = dev; >> + bridge.n_sensors++; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int cio2_bridge_init(void) >> +{ >> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = software_node_register(&cio2_hid_node); >> + >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + pr_err("Failed to register the CIO2 HID node\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + ret = connect_supported_devices(); >> + >> + if ((ret < 0) || (bridge.n_sensors <= 0)) { >> + pr_err("cio2_bridge: Failed to connect any devices\n"); >> + goto out; >> + } else { >> + pr_info("Found %d supported devices\n", bridge.n_sensors); >> + } >> + >> + bridge.cio2 = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, CIO2_PCI_ID, NULL); >> + if (!bridge.cio2) { >> + ret = -ENODEV; >> + goto out; >> + } >> + >> + fwnode = software_node_fwnode(&cio2_hid_node); >> + if (!fwnode) { >> + pr_err("Error getting fwnode from cio2 software_node\n"); >> + ret = -ENODEV; >> + goto out; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * We store the pci_dev's existing fwnode, beccause in the event we >> + * want to reload (I.E. rmmod and insmod) this module we need to give >> + * the device its original fwnode back to prevent problems down the >> + * line >> + */ >> + >> + bridge.cio2_fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(bridge.cio2->dev.fwnode); >> + >> + fwnode->secondary = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); >> + bridge.cio2->dev.fwnode = fwnode; >> + >> + return 0; >> +out: >> + cio2_bridge_exit(); >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(void) >> +{ >> + int i, j; >> + struct sensor *sensor; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < bridge.n_sensors; i++) { >> + sensor = &bridge.sensors[i]; >> + >> + /* give the sensor its original fwnode back */ >> + sensor->dev->fwnode = sensor->fwnode; >> + fwnode_handle_put(sensor->fwnode); >> + put_device(sensor->dev); >> + >> + for (j = 4; j >= 0; j--) >> + software_node_unregister(&sensor->swnodes[j]); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static void cio2_bridge_exit(void) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + >> + /* Give the pci_dev its original fwnode back */ >> + if (bridge.cio2) { >> + bridge.cio2->dev.fwnode = bridge.cio2_fwnode; >> + fwnode_handle_put(bridge.cio2_fwnode); >> + pci_dev_put(bridge.cio2); >> + } >> + >> + ret = cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(); >> + >> + if (ret) >> + pr_err("An error occurred unregistering the sensors\n"); >> + >> + software_node_unregister(&cio2_hid_node); >> +} >> + >> +module_init(cio2_bridge_init); >> +module_exit(cio2_bridge_exit); >> + >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("A bridge driver to connect sensors to CIO2 infrastructure."); >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); >> +MODULE_ALIAS("acpi*:INT343E:*"); _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
