On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:37:13AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:57:12PM +0100, Alex Dewar wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:19:17PM +0100, Alex Dewar wrote: > > > In nbu2ss_eq_queue() memory is allocated with dma_alloc_coherent(), > > > though, strangely, NULL is passed as the struct device* argument. Pass > > > the UDC's device instead. > > I think passing NULL was always wrong, but it used to not cause an Oops. > This was changed a year or two ago. > > > > > > > Build-tested on x86 only. > > > > > > Fixes: 33aa8d45a4fe ("staging: emxx_udc: Add Emma Mobile USB Gadget driver") > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > So I *think* this is the right fix, but I don't have the hardware so > > > I've only been able to build-test it. My worry is that I could be > > > passing in the wrong struct device* here, which would squelch the > > > warning without fixing the breakage. > > > > > > Can someone cleverer than me tell me if this makes sense? > > > > > > - Alex > > > > PS -- I meant to put an RFC in the subject line and an extra tag: > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I don't know which dev pointer we're supposed to pass... It would be > good to find someone to test the patch but if not then applying your > patch is reasonable. > > But could you search through the file and update the rest as well. > The dma_free_coherent() needs to be updated and there was a second > dma_alloc_coherent() in the bug report. > > regards, > dan carpenter > I can only find the one instance of dma_alloc_coherent(). Was it by any chance a different warning about the same call....? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel