On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 02:24:57PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 09:25:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 8/21/20 8:28 AM, Tomer Samara wrote: > > > Remove BUG() from ion_sytem_heap.c > > > > > > this fix the following checkpatch issue: > > > Avoid crashing the kernel - try using WARN_ON & > > > recovery code ratherthan BUG() or BUG_ON(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomer Samara <tomersamara98@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c > > > index eac0632ab4e8..00d6154aec34 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c > > > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int order_to_index(unsigned int order) > > > for (i = 0; i < NUM_ORDERS; i++) > > > if (order == orders[i]) > > > return i; > > > - BUG(); > > > + /* This is impossible. */ > > > return -1; > > > } > > > > Hi, > > Please explain why this is impossible. > > > > If some caller calls order_to_index(5), it will return -1, yes? > > > > I was happy enough with the comment as-is given that I suggested it. > But an alternative comment could be "/* This is impossible. > We always pass valid values to this function. */ Another option is to just change the BUG_ON() to a WARN_ON(). I feel like that communicates the same thing but makes checkpatch happy. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
