On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 09:50:23AM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:41 PM Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 3:03 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > > > > trace_printk should not be used in production code, replace it > > > > call with pr_info. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Sent this before as part of a series (whose 4th patch was a > > > > change that allows to detect such trace_printk), but maybe it's > > > > easier to get individual maintainer attention by splitting it. > > > > > > Mauro should take this soon: > > > > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Mauro: did you get a chance to look at this? (and the other similar > > patch "media: camss: vfe: Use trace_printk for debugging only") > > Mauro: Another gentle ping. Thanks. It's the middle of the merge window, maintainers can't do anything until after 5.9-rc1 is out, sorry. greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel