On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:05 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
<nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 16:33 -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > static void __init of_unittest_pci_dma_ranges(void)
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > index bfc2542d54a8..8dacb9d3b7b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > @@ -1197,6 +1197,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > ret = brcm_phy_start(pcie);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(pcie->dev, "failed to start phy\n");
> > + reset_control_assert(pcie->rescal);
> > return ret;
> > }
>
> I think this sneaked in from another patch.
Thanks Nicolas. BTW, at some point will you be able to test my
patchset on the RP4 to see if I broke anything?
Thanks again,
Jim
>
> Regards,
> Nicolas
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
