On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 03:20:32PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Hey Greg, the staging-next branch seems pretty unstable right now, am > I the only one experiencing this? It was at an arbritrary merge point due to me syncing up to Linus's tree. It's now at .39-rc1. > Unfortunately I cannot debug what is making it unstable at the moment > though. Just curious -- can suck in new 2.6.38 stuff and also tags. > Also would it be too much trouble to ask for private branch tags for > staging-next updates to that we can keep track of which staging-next > commits represents a batch of new updates? This way I can revert back > to the last known merge you made. I tried to use the last ath6kl > merged commit as a base point but that proved to have some kernel > config issues (non ath6kl related) which prevented compilation of the > kernel. At this point I know the last functional staging-next kernel > was based on 2.6.38-rc5 but was unable to find a respective commit to > use for it as a base point for my development. You can always use whatever point you want (i.e. linux-next) and send patches off of that if you want. I'll queue up your patches later this week. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel