Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: remove unused members of struct xmit_buf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/13/20 5:23 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 04:16:07PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 03:38:21PM +0300, Ivan Safonov wrote:
Remove unused members of struct xmit_buf: alloc_sz, ff_hwaddr,
dma_transfer_addr, bpending and last.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Safonov <insafonov@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/rtw_xmit.h  | 5 -----
  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/xmit_linux.c | 1 -
  2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/rtw_xmit.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/rtw_xmit.h
index 12d16e98176a..3c03987c81a1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/rtw_xmit.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/rtw_xmit.h
@@ -193,14 +193,9 @@ struct xmit_buf {
  	void *priv_data;
  	u16 ext_tag; /*  0: Normal xmitbuf, 1: extension xmitbuf. */
  	u16 flags;
-	u32 alloc_sz;
  	u32  len;
  	struct submit_ctx *sctx;
-	u32	ff_hwaddr;
  	struct urb *pxmit_urb[8];
-	dma_addr_t dma_transfer_addr;	/* (in) dma addr for transfer_buffer */
-	u8 bpending[8];
-	int last[8];
  };
struct xmit_frame {
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/xmit_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/xmit_linux.c
index 017e1d628461..61ced1160951 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/xmit_linux.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/xmit_linux.c
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ int rtw_os_xmit_resource_alloc(struct adapter *padapter,
  		return _FAIL;
pxmitbuf->pbuf = PTR_ALIGN(pxmitbuf->pallocated_buf, XMITBUF_ALIGN_SZ);

Not related to this patch but kmalloc always returns data which is at
least ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN aligned which is never less than
XMITBUF_ALIGN_SZ (4) so this is a no-op.

4-byte alignment for 8-byte pointer (for example void *priv_data) on 64-bit arch is an _error_. It’s good that kmalloc (and vmalloc) is already aligned to 8 bytes.


The alignment in the driver is pretty crazy because it's all unnecessary
and so complicated.  Every allocation is 4 bytes extra so we can align
it later.

Also every buffer is called "pbuf" which stands for pointer to buffer.
"pallocated_buf" is not really useful either.

I tried to look at this to see if we could change the alignment, and
it's complicated because of the naming and the alignment.

regards,
dan carpenter


I have already fixed 4 places with unnecessary alignment, but, alas, there is no great desire to test them on real hardware.

Ivan.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux