Vaibhav: s/genric/generic/ in the subject On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:09:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Vaibhav, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on staging/staging-testing] > [also build test ERROR on v5.8-rc3 next-20200629] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vaibhav-Gupta/drivers-staging-use-generic-power-management/20200629-163141 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git 347fa58ff5558075eec98725029c443c80ffbf4a > config: x86_64-rhel-7.6 (attached as .config) > compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make W=1 ARCH=x86_64 > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> If the patch has already been merged and we need an incremental patch that fixes *only* the build issue, I think it's fine to add a "Reported-by" tag. But if this patch hasn't been merged anywhere, I think adding the "Reported-by" tag would be pointless and distracting. This report should result in a v2 posting of the patch with the build issue fixed. There will be no evidence of the problem in the v2 patch. The patch itself contains other changes unrelated to the build issue, so "Reported-by" makes so sense for them. I would treat this as just another review comment, and we don't usually credit those in the commit log (though it's nice if they're mentioned in the v2 cover letter so reviewers know what changed and why). Is there any chance kbuild could be made smart enough to suggest the tag only when it finds an issue in some list of published trees? > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c: In function 'qlge_resume': > >> drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c:4793:17: error: 'pdev' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'qdev'? > 4793 | pci_set_master(pdev); > | ^~~~ > | qdev > ... _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
