Bonjour, Désolé, aucune traduction possible, En français pour comprendre! Merci slts > Le 17 06 2020 à 02:37, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:01:30AM +0200, David Sterba wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:53:50AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 21:57 -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>>> v4: >>>> - Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter >>>> so that it can be backported to stable. >>>> - Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for >>>> now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be >>>> introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged. >>> >>> To this larger audience and last week without reply: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/573b3fbd5927c643920e1364230c296b23e7584d.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx/ >>> >>> Are there _any_ fastpath uses of kfree or vfree? >> >> I'd consider kfree performance critical for cases where it is called >> under locks. If possible the kfree is moved outside of the critical >> section, but we have rbtrees or lists that get deleted under locks and >> restructuring the code to do eg. splice and free it outside of the lock >> is not always possible. > > Not just performance critical, but correctness critical. Since kvfree() > may allocate from the vmalloc allocator, I really think that kvfree() > should assert that it's !in_atomic(). Otherwise we can get into trouble > if we end up calling vfree() and have to take the mutex. Jo-l joel.voyer@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
