On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 05:03:40PM +0200, Jérôme Pouiller wrote: > On Friday 15 May 2020 15:53:59 CEST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:33:11AM +0200, Jerome Pouiller wrote: > > > From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The function hif_scan() return the timeout for the completion of the > > > scan request. It is the only function from hif_tx.c that return another > > > thing than just an error code. This behavior is not coherent with the > > > rest of file. Worse, if value returned is positive, the caller can't > > > make say if it is a timeout or the value returned by the hardware. > > > > > > Uniformize API with other HIF functions, only return the error code and > > > pass timeout with parameters. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c | 6 ++++-- > > > drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.h | 2 +- > > > drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c | 6 +++--- > > > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > This patch fails to apply to my branch, so I've stopped here in the > > patch series. > > Hello Greg, > > Did you applied the patch called "staging: wfx: unlock on error path" from > Dan? I have no idea :) > (I wrote that information in the introduction letter, but maybe I would > had include the Dan's patch in my PR?) I think you should have, as my queue is empty now. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
