On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:51 PM Xin Ji <xji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 07:55:15PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just commenting on the mode_fixup function that was added in v7.
> >
> [snip]
> > > + /*
> > > + * once illegal timing detected, use default HFP, HSYNC, HBP
> > > + */
> > > + if (hblanking < HBLANKING_MIN || (hfp < HP_MIN && hbp < HP_MIN)) {
> >
> > should this be adj_hblanking/adj_hfp/adj_hbp?
> NO, need check original HFP and HBP, if they are not legal, driver need
> set default value to adj_hsync, adj_hfp, adj_hbp.
> >
> > > + adj_hsync = SYNC_LEN_DEF;
> > > + adj_hfp = HFP_HBP_DEF;
> > > + adj_hbp = HFP_HBP_DEF;
> > > + vref = adj->clock * 1000 / (adj->htotal * adj->vtotal);
> > > + if (hblanking < HBLANKING_MIN) {
> > > + delta_adj = HBLANKING_MIN - hblanking;
> > > + adj_clock = vref * delta_adj * adj->vtotal;
> > > + adj->clock += DIV_ROUND_UP(adj_clock, 1000);
> > > + } else {
> > > + delta_adj = hblanking - HBLANKING_MIN;
> > > + adj_clock = vref * delta_adj * adj->vtotal;
> > > + adj->clock -= DIV_ROUND_UP(adj_clock, 1000);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + DRM_WARN("illegal hblanking timing, use default.\n");
> > > + DRM_WARN("hfp(%d),hbp(%d),hsync(%d).\n", hfp, hbp, hsync);
> >
> > How likely is it that this mode is going to work? Can you just return
> > false here to reject the mode?
> We want to set the default minimal Hblancking value, then it may display,
> otherwise. If we just return false, there is no display for sure.
Right, understand your argument. I'm pondering if it's not just better
to reject the mode rather than trying a timing that is definitely
quite different from what the monitor was asking for. No super strong
opinion, I'll let other people on the list weigh in.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
