Re: [PATCH] Staging: fbtft : fbtft-bus: fixed two checkpatch errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 09:30:47AM +0200, carlosteniswarrior@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Carlos Guerrero Álvarez <carlosteniswarrior@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Fixed two checkpatch space prohibited before that close parenthesis errors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Guerrero Álvarez <carlosteniswarrior@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
> index 63c65dd67b17..cdb451dd3fde 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
> @@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ out:									      \
>  }                                                                             \
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(func);
>  
> -define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg8_bus8, u8, u8, )
> +define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg8_bus8, u8, u8,)
>  define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus8, __be16, u16, cpu_to_be16)
> -define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus16, u16, u16, )
> +define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus16, u16, u16,)

If I remember correct, the original code here is required, due to how
some older versions of gcc works.

Did you test-build this?  Did it work properly?

I would just leave this alone,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux