On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 04:32:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 04:25:17PM +0200, Oscar Carter wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:56:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 02:26:09PM +0200, Oscar Carter wrote: > > > > Create a constant array with the values of the "phy->signal" for every > > > > rate. Remove all "phy->signal" assignments inside the switch statement > > > > and replace these with a single reading from the new vnt_phy_signal > > > > array. > > > > > > > > The constant array can be of one dimension because the OR mask with > > > > BIT(3) or BIT(4) allow obtain a second value according to the rate, > > > > the preamble_type and the pkt_type. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@xxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c | 105 ++++++++---------------------- > > > > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) > > > > > > This series did not apply to my tree, please rebase and resend. > > > > Rebase the patchs is a normal process in the development or am I doing something > > wrong ? > > It's normal when multiple people are working on the same area with lots > of patches flying around. Not a problem, it doesn't bother me at all :) Thanks for the clarification about this theme. > > thanks, > > greg k-h thanks, oscar carter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
