On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:27:14PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:58:02PM +0100, Oscar Carter wrote:
> > Define the EnCFG_BBType_MASK bit as an OR operation between two previous
> > defines instead of using the OR between two new BIT macros. Thus, the
> > code is more clear.
> >
> > Fixes: a74081b44291 ("staging: vt6656: Use BIT() macro instead of hex value")
> > Signed-off-by: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h b/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h
> > index c532b27de37f..b01d9ee8677e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h
> > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
> > #define EnCFG_BBType_a 0x00
> > #define EnCFG_BBType_b BIT(0)
> > #define EnCFG_BBType_g BIT(1)
> > -#define EnCFG_BBType_MASK (BIT(0) | BIT(1))
> > +#define EnCFG_BBType_MASK (EnCFG_BBType_b | EnCFG_BBType_g)
>
> This does not "fix" anything, like your "Fixes:" tag implies. It just
> cleans up the code some more. Only use Fixes: if it actually fixes a
> problem introduced by a previous patch.
>
Ok, thanks for the explanation.
> Can you remove that line and resend?
>
Yes, I will remove that line, I will create a new version of this patch and I
will resend it.
> thanks.
>
> greg k-h
Thanks,
oscar carter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
