On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:04:48 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:55:38PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:02:12 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:52:39PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 05:34:08PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Linus Torvalds > > > > > <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The one with inifinite errors was vt6655. > > > > > > > > > > vt6656 had same/similar issues. In fact, maybe it's simply because I > > > > > built both of them in, and get infinite "multiple definitions" because > > > > > they are the same driver with small differences? > > > > > > > > Ah, probably, if they are both built into the kernel that might happen > > > > due to the global symbols in them. Actually that's odd, Randy's usual > > > > 'randconfig' tester usually catches these, I'll make the Kconfig files > > > > force them to be modules to keep this from happening in the future. > > > > > > Yes, that looks like the problem, as building them as modules in your > > > tree right now works just fine. > > > > > > This patch below should solve your build issue, let me know if it > > > doesn't. > > > > Thanks for the patch. You had suggested 1-2 months ago that someone do > > this, so I was waiting to see if someone would actually do it. > > Ah, sorry about that, I forgot about it. > > > I was hoping that a staging developer would do it (not the staging > > maintainer). > > Heh, well, these drivers are just "placeholders" as the "real" in-kernel > drivers are being developed for this hardware, so I don't expect to see > much, if any development happening on them. oh well, rm -rf them then. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
