On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 02:40:43AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 09:46 +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 12:29:38AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 08:15:59AM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 12:05:32AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 01:31:17AM +0900, Tetsuhiro Kohada wrote: > > > > > > remove 'dos_name','ShortName' and related definitions. > > > > > > > > > > > > 'dos_name' and 'ShortName' are definitions before VFAT. > > > > > > These are never used in exFAT. > > > > > > > > > > Why are we still seeing patches for the exfat in staging? > > > > > > > > Because people like doing cleanup patches :) > > > > > > Sure, but I think people also like to believe that their cleanup patches > > > are making a difference. In this case, they're just churning code that's > > > only weeks away from deletion. > > > > > > > > Why are people not working on the Samsung code base? > > > > > > > > They are, see the patches on the list, hopefully they get merged after > > > > -rc1 is out. > > > > > > I meant the cleanup people. Obviously _some_ people are working on the > > > Samsung codebase. > > > > We can't tell people to work on :) > > That's more an argument to remove exfat from staging > sooner than later. I will remove it when the other patchset is merged, let's not remove code that is being used, that's not how we do things, you all know this... greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
