On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 03:16:23PM +0100, Julian Preis wrote: > Rename every instance of <ffsCamelCaseExample> to <ffs_camel_case_example> > in file exfat_super.c. Fix resulting overlong lines. > > Co-developed-by: Johannes Weidner <johannes.weidner@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weidner <johannes.weidner@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Julian Preis <julian.preis@xxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v2: > - Add email recipients according to get_maintainer.pl > - Add patch versions > - Use in-reply-to > > drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c | 99 +++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c > index 6e481908c59f..14ff3fce70fb 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c > @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static inline void exfat_save_attr(struct inode *inode, u32 attr) > EXFAT_I(inode)->fid.attr = attr & (ATTR_RWMASK | ATTR_READONLY); > } > > -static int ffsMountVol(struct super_block *sb) > +static int ffs_mount_vol(struct super_block *sb) Why do these static functions even have to have "ffs" at the front of them anyway? There's no requirement here, right? Shouldn't this just be "mount_vol()"? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
