Re: [PATCH v2 20/23] staging: qlge: Fix CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!

On 11.12.2019 21:12, Scott Schafer wrote:

chage udelay() to usleep_range()

   Change?

Signed-off-by: Scott Schafer <schaferjscott@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
index e18aa335c899..9427386e4a1e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ int ql_sem_spinlock(struct ql_adapter *qdev, u32 sem_mask)
  	do {
  		if (!ql_sem_trylock(qdev, sem_mask))
  			return 0;
-		udelay(100);
+		usleep_range(100, 200);

   I hope you're not in atomic context...

  	} while (--wait_count);
  	return -ETIMEDOUT;
  }

MBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux