Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: replace uintXX_t to uXX and intXX_t to sXX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 05:04:49PM +0000, Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> I know that uXX is prefered over uintXX_t. However, I dislike to change 
> 650 lines of code only for this purpose in one batch. It will generate 
> plenty of conflicts with branches currently in development. 

Now that the code is in the kernel tree, any "branches currently in
development" have to deal with what is merged upstream no matter if they
are tiny or big patches.  That's just the joy of working with upstream,
sorry.

If you want to do out-of-tree development, that's fine, but you can't
also want the code in-tree at the same time.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux