Re: [PATCH RFC v1 06/12] staging/gasket: Prepare gasket_release_page() for PG_reserved changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22.10.19 19:12, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Right now, ZONE_DEVICE memory is always set PG_reserved. We want to
change that.

The pages are obtained via get_user_pages_fast(). I assume, these
could be ZONE_DEVICE pages. Let's just exclude them as well explicitly.

Cc: Rob Springer <rspringer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ben Chan <benchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c b/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c
index f6d715787da8..d43fed58bf65 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static bool gasket_release_page(struct page *page)
  	if (!page)
  		return false;
- if (!PageReserved(page))
+	if (!PageReserved(page) && !is_zone_device_page(page))
  		SetPageDirty(page);
  	put_page(page);


@Dan, is SetPageDirty() on ZONE_DEVICE pages bad or do we simply not care? I think that ending up with ZONE_DEVICE pages here is very unlikely. I'd like to drop this (and the next) patch and document why it is okay to do so.

--

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux