Hi Chuhong,
Thanks for the patch.
On Mon 14 Oct 2019 at 03:08, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> devm_regulator_get may return an error but mipi_csis_phy_init misses
> a check for it.
> This may lead to problems when regulator_set_voltage uses the unchecked
> pointer.
> This patch adds a check for devm_regulator_get to avoid potential risk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c
> index 73d8354e618c..9a07b54c4ab1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx7-mipi-csis.c
> @@ -350,6 +350,8 @@ static void mipi_csis_sw_reset(struct csi_state *state)
> static int mipi_csis_phy_init(struct csi_state *state)
> {
> state->mipi_phy_regulator = devm_regulator_get(state->dev, "phy");
> + if (IS_ERR(state->mipi_phy_regulator))
> + return PTR_ERR(state->mipi_phy_regulator);
This regulator is marked as mandatory in the device tree entry,
however it looks good to me to have this check, even because it
can return -EPROBE_DEFER and we need to retry.
But for that we may need to extend this patch to make the caller
of this (mipi_csis_probe), to also really care about the returned
code.
Cheers,
Rui
>
> return regulator_set_voltage(state->mipi_phy_regulator, 1000000,
> 1000000);
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
